Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector

This paper examines the effects of pecuniary compensation on the ability and motivation of individuals in organizations with non-pecuniary or pro-social missions. In particular, the paper compares flat pay systems, unrelated with ability or effort,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Banuri, Sheheryar, Keefer, Philip
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/05/24467929/weber-right-effects-pay-ability-pay-performance-pro-social-motivation-ability-effort-public-sector
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21993
id okr-10986-21993
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-219932021-04-23T14:04:06Z Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector Banuri, Sheheryar Keefer, Philip SKILLS EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS E-MAIL RELIABILITY MOTIVATION STUDY ACCOUNTING PERSONALITY WAGES SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS SCIENCE TIME FRAME RESULTS BASIC FAMILY INCOME AGE VALUE COMPETITIVENESS GENDER ACTIVITIES GROUPS SYSTEMS INFORMATION POLITICAL ECONOMY EFFORT IMAGE EFFECTS SOCIAL BEHAVIOR INCENTIVES TRANSMISSION INTRINSIC MOTIVATION PRIVATE SECTOR SYSTEM ECONOMIC THEORY PAYMENTS CODES ECONOMICS LANGUAGE MANAGEMENT MEDIA ADMINISTRATION OPEN ACCESS COMPUTER RESULT KNOWLEDGE INSTITUTIONS DATA LIMITATIONS THEORY EDUCATION RISK DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS COMPUTERS HUMAN RESOURCES PERFORMANCE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BARGAINING INTUITION SCREEN RESOLUTION OUTPUTS ATTENTION TARGETS ABILITY PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION LAW PROFIT IDEAS STUDENTS FINANCIAL SUPPORT IT WEBSITE SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS AT WEB PAYOUTS LEARNING OUTCOMES HIGH WAGES RECALL PRIMING STUDENT LEARNING COMPUTER SCREEN DEMOGRAPHICS USES FINANCE EFFICIENCY CAPABILITIES PRIVATE INFORMATION This paper examines the effects of pecuniary compensation on the ability and motivation of individuals in organizations with non-pecuniary or pro-social missions. In particular, the paper compares flat pay systems, unrelated with ability or effort, to two other systems that are considered superior: high-powered, pay for performance schemes and more traditional, “Weberian” schemes that calibrate pay to ability, independent of effort. The analysis uses a sample of future public sector workers and finds that all three pay schemes attract motivated workers into tasks with a pro-social mission. However, flat pay schemes also attract low ability workers. In the short run, pay-for-performance schemes generate higher effort than flat pay and pay-for-ability systems, a difference driven entirely by effects on unmotivated workers. Once selection effects are accounted for, however, workers with pay for ability and pay for performance exert statistically indistinguishable levels of effort in the pro-social task. Moreover, pay for ability elicits effort at lower cost than pay for performance. 2015-06-02T16:39:31Z 2015-06-02T16:39:31Z 2015-05 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/05/24467929/weber-right-effects-pay-ability-pay-performance-pro-social-motivation-ability-effort-public-sector http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21993 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7261 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic SKILLS
EMPLOYMENT
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS
E-MAIL
RELIABILITY
MOTIVATION
STUDY
ACCOUNTING
PERSONALITY
WAGES
SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
SCIENCE
TIME FRAME
RESULTS
BASIC
FAMILY
INCOME
AGE
VALUE
COMPETITIVENESS
GENDER
ACTIVITIES
GROUPS
SYSTEMS
INFORMATION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
EFFORT
IMAGE
EFFECTS
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
INCENTIVES
TRANSMISSION
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION
PRIVATE SECTOR
SYSTEM
ECONOMIC THEORY
PAYMENTS
CODES
ECONOMICS
LANGUAGE
MANAGEMENT
MEDIA
ADMINISTRATION
OPEN ACCESS
COMPUTER
RESULT
KNOWLEDGE
INSTITUTIONS
DATA LIMITATIONS
THEORY
EDUCATION
RISK
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
COMPUTERS
HUMAN RESOURCES
PERFORMANCE
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
BARGAINING
INTUITION
SCREEN RESOLUTION
OUTPUTS
ATTENTION
TARGETS
ABILITY
PRODUCTIVITY
INSTITUTION
LAW
PROFIT
IDEAS
STUDENTS
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
IT
WEBSITE
SOCIETY
ORGANIZATIONS
AT
WEB
PAYOUTS
LEARNING
OUTCOMES
HIGH WAGES
RECALL
PRIMING
STUDENT LEARNING
COMPUTER SCREEN
DEMOGRAPHICS
USES
FINANCE
EFFICIENCY
CAPABILITIES
PRIVATE INFORMATION
spellingShingle SKILLS
EMPLOYMENT
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS
E-MAIL
RELIABILITY
MOTIVATION
STUDY
ACCOUNTING
PERSONALITY
WAGES
SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
SCIENCE
TIME FRAME
RESULTS
BASIC
FAMILY
INCOME
AGE
VALUE
COMPETITIVENESS
GENDER
ACTIVITIES
GROUPS
SYSTEMS
INFORMATION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
EFFORT
IMAGE
EFFECTS
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
INCENTIVES
TRANSMISSION
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION
PRIVATE SECTOR
SYSTEM
ECONOMIC THEORY
PAYMENTS
CODES
ECONOMICS
LANGUAGE
MANAGEMENT
MEDIA
ADMINISTRATION
OPEN ACCESS
COMPUTER
RESULT
KNOWLEDGE
INSTITUTIONS
DATA LIMITATIONS
THEORY
EDUCATION
RISK
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
COMPUTERS
HUMAN RESOURCES
PERFORMANCE
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
BARGAINING
INTUITION
SCREEN RESOLUTION
OUTPUTS
ATTENTION
TARGETS
ABILITY
PRODUCTIVITY
INSTITUTION
LAW
PROFIT
IDEAS
STUDENTS
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
IT
WEBSITE
SOCIETY
ORGANIZATIONS
AT
WEB
PAYOUTS
LEARNING
OUTCOMES
HIGH WAGES
RECALL
PRIMING
STUDENT LEARNING
COMPUTER SCREEN
DEMOGRAPHICS
USES
FINANCE
EFFICIENCY
CAPABILITIES
PRIVATE INFORMATION
Banuri, Sheheryar
Keefer, Philip
Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7261
description This paper examines the effects of pecuniary compensation on the ability and motivation of individuals in organizations with non-pecuniary or pro-social missions. In particular, the paper compares flat pay systems, unrelated with ability or effort, to two other systems that are considered superior: high-powered, pay for performance schemes and more traditional, “Weberian” schemes that calibrate pay to ability, independent of effort. The analysis uses a sample of future public sector workers and finds that all three pay schemes attract motivated workers into tasks with a pro-social mission. However, flat pay schemes also attract low ability workers. In the short run, pay-for-performance schemes generate higher effort than flat pay and pay-for-ability systems, a difference driven entirely by effects on unmotivated workers. Once selection effects are accounted for, however, workers with pay for ability and pay for performance exert statistically indistinguishable levels of effort in the pro-social task. Moreover, pay for ability elicits effort at lower cost than pay for performance.
format Working Paper
author Banuri, Sheheryar
Keefer, Philip
author_facet Banuri, Sheheryar
Keefer, Philip
author_sort Banuri, Sheheryar
title Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector
title_short Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector
title_full Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector
title_fullStr Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector
title_full_unstemmed Was Weber Right? : The Effects of Pay for Ability and Pay for Performance on Pro-Social Motivation, Ability and Effort in the Public Sector
title_sort was weber right? : the effects of pay for ability and pay for performance on pro-social motivation, ability and effort in the public sector
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2015
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/05/24467929/weber-right-effects-pay-ability-pay-performance-pro-social-motivation-ability-effort-public-sector
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21993
_version_ 1764449856100761600