A Systematic Tale of Two Differing Reviews : Evaluating the Evidence on Public and Private Sector Quality of Primary Care in Low and Middle Income Countries
Systematic reviews are powerful tools for summarizing vast amounts of data in controversial areas; but their utility is limited by methodological choices and assumptions. Two systematic reviews of literature on the quality of private sector primary care in low and middle income countries (LMIC), pub...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Published: |
Springer
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31372 |