Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment

On August 4, 2020, a massive explosion rocked the Port of Beirut (PoB), destroying much ofthe port and severely damaging dense residential and commercial areas within five kilometersof the site of the explosion. The disaster left more than 200 peop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: World Bank Group, European Union, United Nations
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/191691598832635302/Beirut-Rapid-Damage-and-Needs-Assessment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34401
id okr-10986-34401
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-344012022-09-12T12:44:37Z Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment World Bank Group European Union United Nations DAMAGE AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONFLICT-AFFECTED STATES STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT DISASTER LOSSES RECOVERY RECONSTRUCTION MACROECONOMIC IMPACT SOCIAL SECTORS INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCIAL SECTOR PRODUCTIVE SECTOR SOCIAL INCLUSION POVERTY GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT On August 4, 2020, a massive explosion rocked the Port of Beirut (PoB), destroying much ofthe port and severely damaging dense residential and commercial areas within five kilometersof the site of the explosion. The disaster left more than 200 people dead, thousands injured, andmany homeless. Shocking pictures and videos from the Lebanese capital were shared widely acrossthe planet, showing a city in ruins and the suffering of those affected. Beyond the human tragedy, the economic impact of the explosion is notable at the national level despite the geographic concentration of the destruction. This reflects: (i) the demographic clustering of the Lebanese population in Beirut and its suburbs; (ii) the prominence of economic activity in the affected areas, especially in regard to commerce, real estate and tourism; and (iii) the fact that the PoB is the main point of entry/exit for the small open economy, channeling 68 percent (2011-2018 average) of the country’s total external trade. Even prior to the explosion, Lebanon was already reeling from multiple crises since 2011. These included: (i) spillovers from the conflict in Syria, which led Lebanon to host the largest refugee per capita population in the world; (ii) a financial and economic crisis that has induced systemic macrofinancial failures, including, impairment of the banking sector and risk of deposits; an exchange rate collapse; a default on sovereign debt; triple digit inflation rates; and a severe economic contraction; and (iii) impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic; Lebanon, not unlike other countries, responded with lockdowns that further exacerbated economic and financial stresses. The above add to long-term structural vulnerabilities that include low-grade infrastructure—a dysfunctional electricity sector, water supply shortages, inadequate solid waste and wastewater management—public financial mismanagement, large macroeconomic imbalances, and deteriorating social indicators. These vulnerabilities are taking place against the backdrop of high levels of corruption, political turmoil, and weak governance. Internationally, Lebanon was sub-optimally integrated into the global economy and global value chains, and the sizeable and persistent migration of highly educated human resources to foreign labor markets (brain drain) further contributed to poor productivity. As a result, the economy has struggled to reduce poverty and to generate inclusive growth, with job creation remaining weak and poorly distributed even during periods of high GDP growth. The long-run employment-growth elasticity is estimated to be 0.2,2 much lower than an estimated MENA average of 0.5.3 Meanwhile, the generated employment has been concentrated in low productivity activities as those involving higher productivity have not grown proportionally. Since foreign labor dominated low skilled (less productive) activities, high GDP growth rates have not translated into significant job creation for the Lebanese. 2020-08-31T15:09:20Z 2020-08-31T15:09:20Z 2020-08-31 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/191691598832635302/Beirut-Rapid-Damage-and-Needs-Assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34401 English Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work Economic & Sector Work :: Risk and Vulnerability Assessment Middle East and North Africa Lebanon
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic DAMAGE AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT
CONFLICT-AFFECTED STATES
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
DISASTER LOSSES
RECOVERY
RECONSTRUCTION
MACROECONOMIC IMPACT
SOCIAL SECTORS
INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCIAL SECTOR
PRODUCTIVE SECTOR
SOCIAL INCLUSION
POVERTY
GOVERNANCE
ENVIRONMENT
spellingShingle DAMAGE AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT
CONFLICT-AFFECTED STATES
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
DISASTER LOSSES
RECOVERY
RECONSTRUCTION
MACROECONOMIC IMPACT
SOCIAL SECTORS
INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCIAL SECTOR
PRODUCTIVE SECTOR
SOCIAL INCLUSION
POVERTY
GOVERNANCE
ENVIRONMENT
World Bank Group
European Union
United Nations
Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment
geographic_facet Middle East and North Africa
Lebanon
relation Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment
description On August 4, 2020, a massive explosion rocked the Port of Beirut (PoB), destroying much ofthe port and severely damaging dense residential and commercial areas within five kilometersof the site of the explosion. The disaster left more than 200 people dead, thousands injured, andmany homeless. Shocking pictures and videos from the Lebanese capital were shared widely acrossthe planet, showing a city in ruins and the suffering of those affected. Beyond the human tragedy, the economic impact of the explosion is notable at the national level despite the geographic concentration of the destruction. This reflects: (i) the demographic clustering of the Lebanese population in Beirut and its suburbs; (ii) the prominence of economic activity in the affected areas, especially in regard to commerce, real estate and tourism; and (iii) the fact that the PoB is the main point of entry/exit for the small open economy, channeling 68 percent (2011-2018 average) of the country’s total external trade. Even prior to the explosion, Lebanon was already reeling from multiple crises since 2011. These included: (i) spillovers from the conflict in Syria, which led Lebanon to host the largest refugee per capita population in the world; (ii) a financial and economic crisis that has induced systemic macrofinancial failures, including, impairment of the banking sector and risk of deposits; an exchange rate collapse; a default on sovereign debt; triple digit inflation rates; and a severe economic contraction; and (iii) impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic; Lebanon, not unlike other countries, responded with lockdowns that further exacerbated economic and financial stresses. The above add to long-term structural vulnerabilities that include low-grade infrastructure—a dysfunctional electricity sector, water supply shortages, inadequate solid waste and wastewater management—public financial mismanagement, large macroeconomic imbalances, and deteriorating social indicators. These vulnerabilities are taking place against the backdrop of high levels of corruption, political turmoil, and weak governance. Internationally, Lebanon was sub-optimally integrated into the global economy and global value chains, and the sizeable and persistent migration of highly educated human resources to foreign labor markets (brain drain) further contributed to poor productivity. As a result, the economy has struggled to reduce poverty and to generate inclusive growth, with job creation remaining weak and poorly distributed even during periods of high GDP growth. The long-run employment-growth elasticity is estimated to be 0.2,2 much lower than an estimated MENA average of 0.5.3 Meanwhile, the generated employment has been concentrated in low productivity activities as those involving higher productivity have not grown proportionally. Since foreign labor dominated low skilled (less productive) activities, high GDP growth rates have not translated into significant job creation for the Lebanese.
format Report
author World Bank Group
European Union
United Nations
author_facet World Bank Group
European Union
United Nations
author_sort World Bank Group
title Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment
title_short Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment
title_full Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment
title_fullStr Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Beirut Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment
title_sort beirut rapid damage and needs assessment
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2020
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/191691598832635302/Beirut-Rapid-Damage-and-Needs-Assessment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34401
_version_ 1764480823308845056